Micro Economics Meaning Nature And Scope
Economics is the study of those activities of human beings, which are concerned, with the satisfaction of unlimited wants by using the limited resources. Micro means the millionth part. The term micro has been taken from the Greek word mikros meaning small. Under microeconomics we study the individual units like a consumer, a firm, an industry, price determination of a particular commodity etc. In short the microeconomics deals with the study of the economic problems of a single unit like a firm or small economic units or resource owners. The main objective of microeconomics is to study the principles, policies and the problems relating to the optimum allocation of resources. From the theoretical point of view it tells us the functioning of a free enterprise economy. It explains us how through the market mechanism goods and services produced in the economy are distributed.
Nature and scope of Micro Economics
In the nature of economics we may consider whether it is a science or an art. Science not only means the collection of facts but it also means that the facts are arranged in such a manner that they speak for themselves. It means that some laws are discovered through these facts. Thus science is a systematic body of knowledge concerning the relationship between causes and effects of a particular phenomenon.
Characteristics of a science
- First of all the facts are observed. E.g. when price rise the demand contracts.
- The facts in this step are properly classified. Like if price falls how much the demand has fallen.
- After the compilation of facts and having knowledge about the magnitude of a problem a law is framed keeping onto consideration the cause and effect of a fact. E.g. Law of demand
- The final feature of science is by applying the scientific laws to real life. It is verified whether they are valid or not.Thus from the above discussion it could be concluded that economics is a science. But some economists believe that it is not an exact science.Whether it’s a social science or a natural scienceArguments in favour of social science
- Economics is a systematic study. It is the study of the interrelated activities like production consumption and exchange of wealth.
- Laws of economics show a cause and effect relationship between them
- Laws of economics are based on real experiences of life.Arguments against economics as a natural law
- The laws of economics are not the exact laws. Like law of economics does not operate if there is a change in the income of the person or a change in price of substitute goods.
- Economics laws are far from universal applicability. These laws cannot be applied in all situations and at all the times.
- The laws of economics cannot be verified in the laboratories. In the exceptional cases even the information or the results obtained through the application can prove to be futile.Thus economics is not a natural science. It is a social science.Economics As A Positive Or A Normative SciencePositive science is that science which studies an accurate and true description of events as they happen. Thus it deals with what, how and why. Normative science is suggestive in nature. Normative science tells us what ought to be.Economics as a positive science
- Positive science is logical whereas normative science is emotional. Therefore it is more exacts it is based on the logic.
- If economics studies only the realities of the real world then the chances of the disagreement are less, as the case would be if it studies both.
- The economists cannot make the rational judgments if they try to analyze both what is and what ought to be.Economics as a normative science1. Economics would offer more meaningful conclusions if it gives suggestions too long with the facts.2. Economics will be more useful if it is fruit bearing too along with the light bearing. Most of the people study economics for the fruits and not for the light merely.3 if the economist synchronizes the analysis of economic problems with concrete economic policies he would save time. Else it would be difficult if one person finds the solutions and the other tries to justify those solutions.Thus the argument can be put to an end only by saying that it is both the positive as well as a normative scienceArguments in favour of economics as an artMany economists like Marshall, Pigou etc. believe that economics is an art also besides being a scienceEconomics as an art
- Economics offer a solution to the problems of human beings. It tells us how we can make the judicious use of our resources.
- It is through the art that we can verify the economic laws. For example the law of demand
- The doubts can be removed by dividing the economics into science as well as an art.Arguments against art
- Science and art are different. If economics is science it cannot be art and if it is an art it cannot be a science.
- Economic problems are influenced by social and political nature. Therefore economics cannot be considered from the economic point of view only.UTILITYIt’s the want satisfying power of a commodity.
- Utility is subjective. It depends upon the human wants.
- Utility keeps on changing with time and place.
- It need not be always useful.
- Utility has nothing to do with the morality.Measurement of utilityIt can be measured both in terms of money as well as in terms of units. If two persons pay different sum of money for the same amount of commodity then it is the measurement in terms of money.Marshall, Jevons and Menger etc have tried to measure it in terms of cardinal numbers. Pareto, Allen, Hicks etc. measured it in ordinal an term that is Indifference curve approach.Utility has three concepts:
- Initial utility
- Marginal utility
- Total utilityMarginal utility can further be divided into Positive Marginal Utility or Zero Marginal Utility or Negative Marginal Utility
Quantity
| Total utility | Marginal utility |
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
8
|
8
|
2
|
14
|
6
|
3
|
18
|
4
|
4
|
20
|
2
|
5
|
20
|
0
|
6
|
18
|
-2
|
Opportunity costs
Opportunity costs may be defined as the expected returns from the second best use of the resources which are foregone due to the scarcity of resources. E.g. if with a sum of Rs. 1 lakhs one can purchase two machines. One yields a profit of Rs.20000 and the other a profit of Rs. 10000. Now the buyer will forego the use which is less productive. It can also be termed as economic rent
(Rs. 20000 – Rs 10000 = Rs. 10000)
Explicit and Implicit costs
Marginal and Incremental costs
It is the change in Total costs due to the production of one more or one less unit of a factor of production.
MC = TCn – TCn-1
Incremental costs refer to the total additional costs associated with the decisions to expand output or to add a new variety of product etc. In the long run when firms expand their production they hire more of men, machinery and equipments. These expenditures are included in the incremental costs. These costs also arise due to change in the product lines, addition or introduction of a new product, replacement of worn out plant and machinery, replacement of old techniques of production with a new one etc.
Sunk costs are those costs, which cannot be increased or decreased by varying the rate of output. Example once it is decided to make incremental investment expenditure and the funds are allocated, all the preceding costs are considered to be the sunk costs as these costs cannot be recovered when there is a change in the market decisions.
EQUILIBRIUM
Equilibrium is a state of balance. In fact sometimes the modern economics is also called as an equilibrium analysis. When the forces act in the opposite direction is in the state of rest they are called as to be in the equilibrium. Equilibrium can be a stable equilibrium, unstable equilibrium or a neutral equilibrium.
1) Stable equilibrium is that equilibrium in which the object concerned after having been disturbed reverts back to the original state.
2) In an unstable equilibrium a slight disturbance further evokes disturbance.
- In the neutral equilibrium the disturbing forces neither bring it back nor theycan take it away from the equilibrium position.Short term or the long-term equilibriumIn the short run demand plays an important role in the determination of price and in the long run both demand and supply plays an important role.Partial and general equilibriumPartial equilibrium excludes certain variable and studies a few selected items at a time. This method takes into consideration the impact of one or two variables and keeps all others constant. E.g. demand and supply depends upon many variables but for the sake of simplicity we study only a few aspects.In case of general equilibrium analysis
An analysis that treats various individual units and markets as interrelated and attempts to trace the consequence of an economic event is called the general equilibrium. In the process of making the decisions the consumers as well as the firms affect the prices of the commodities. The changes in the prices serve as signals to various consumers and firms that affect their decisions accordingly. In this way the changes in the prices will go on bringing the changes in the quantities supplied and demanded until equilibrium in all the markets is not achieved simultaneously.
Static and dynamic approaches
The word static generally means a position of rest but in economics it means a state in which there is a continuous, regular, certain and constant movement without any change. According to Clark there is an absence of the following five types of changes 1) size of population 2) supply of capital 3) methods of production 4) forms of business organization and 5) the wants of the people.
Harrod is of the view that static analysis is concerned with the lack of investment in the economy. In static economics we do not study about the sequences, lags etc. its like ordinary demand and supply theory. Example people continue to be born and die but births equal deaths so there is no change in the numbers but the composition of population is changing. The major drawback is that it takes us far from the actual picture assuming the variables constant.




